SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

Commission File Number 001-12488

Powell Industries, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(713) 944-6900

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of Act:

Common Stock, par value $.01 per share

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ          No o

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     o

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).     Yes  þ          No o

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).  o Yes          No þ

      Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. o Yes          No þ

      If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. o Yes          No þ

      The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last business day of the most recently completed second fiscal quarter, April 30, 2005, was approximately $194,745,000.

      Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

      At January 12, 2006, there were outstanding 10,853,378 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share.

Documents Incorporated By Reference

      Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2006 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed not later than 120 days after October 31, 2005, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

POWELL INDUSTRIES, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS;

RISK FACTORS

Forward-Looking Statements

      This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements based on the Company’s current expectations, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include information concerning future results of operations and financial condition. Statements that contain words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” “continue,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “predict,” “will,” or similar expressions may be forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, and many factors could affect the future financial results and condition of the Company. Factors that may have a material effect on our revenues, expenses and operating results include adverse business or market conditions, the Company’s ability to secure and satisfy customers, the availability and cost of materials from suppliers, adverse competitive developments and changes in customer requirements as well as those circumstances discussed under “Risk Factors,” below. Accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this Report. Any forward-looking statements made by or on our behalf are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

      The forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report are based on current assumptions that the Company will continue to develop, market, manufacture, and ship products and provide services on a competitive and timely basis, that competitive conditions in the Company’s markets will not change in a materially adverse way, that the Company will accurately identify and meet customer needs for products and services, that the Company will be able to retain and hire key employees, that the Company’s capabilities will remain competitive, that risks related to shifts in customer demand are minimized and that there will be no material adverse change in the operations or business of the Company. Assumptions relating to these factors involve judgments that are based on available information, which may not be complete, and are subject to changes in many factors beyond the control of the Company that can materially affect results. Because of these and other factors that affect our operating results, past financial performance should not be considered an indicator of future performance, and investors should not use historical trends to anticipate results or trends in future periods.

Risk Factors

      Our business is subject to a variety of risks, including the risks described below. While we believe that the risks and uncertainties described below are the more significant risks and uncertainties facing our business, they are not the only ones facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not known to us or not described below may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed and we may not be able to achieve our goals. This Annual Report also includes statements reflecting assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions or beliefs about future events that are intended as “forward-looking statements” under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and should be read in conjunction with the discussion under Forward-Looking Statements, above.

      Many of our competitors are significantly larger and have substantially greater resources than we do. Competition in the industry depends on a number of factors, including price. Certain of our competitors may have lower cost structures and may, therefore, be able to provide their products or services at lower rates than we are able to provide. We cannot be certain that our competitors will not develop the expertise, experience and resources to provide services that are superior in both price and quality to our services. Similarly, we cannot be certain that we will be able to maintain or enhance our competitive position within our industry, maintain our customer base at current levels or increase our customer base.

      If the general level of economic activity deteriorates from current levels, our customers may delay or cancel new projects. A number of factors, including financing conditions for and potential bankruptcies in the industries we serve, could adversely affect our customers and their ability or willingness to fund capital expenditures in the future or pay for past services. In addition, consolidation, competition or capital constraints in the industries we serve may result in reduced spending by, or the loss of, one or more of our customers.

      International sales accounted for approximately 25% of our revenues in fiscal 2005, including sales from our operations in the United Kingdom which were acquired in July 2005. We primarily operate in developed countries with stable operating and fiscal environments. The occurrence of any of the risks described below could have an adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows and financial condition:

      Our raw material costs represented approximately 51% of our revenues in fiscal 2005. We purchase a wide variety of raw materials to manufacture our products including steel, aluminum, copper, and various electrical components. Unanticipated increases in raw material requirements or price increases could increase production costs and adversely affect profitability.

      We currently generate, and expect to continue to generate, a significant portion of our revenues under fixed-price contracts. We must estimate the costs of completing a particular project to bid for fixed-price contracts. The cost of labor and materials, however, may vary from the costs we originally estimated. These variations, along with other risks inherent in performing fixed-price contracts, may cause actual revenue and gross profits for a project to differ from those we originally estimated and could result in reduced profitability or losses on projects. Depending upon the size of a particular project, variations from the estimated contract costs could have a significant impact on our operating results for any fiscal quarter or year.

      We intend to pursue growth through the pursuit of opportunities to acquire companies or assets that will enable us to expand our product and service offerings. We routinely review potential acquisitions. However, we may be unable to implement this growth strategy if we cannot reach agreement on potential strategic acquisitions on acceptable terms or for other reasons. Moreover, our acquisition strategy involves certain risks, including:

      Future acquisitions may require us to obtain additional equity or debt financing, which may not be available on attractive terms.

      As discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” and in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, a significant portion of our revenues is recognized on a percentage-of-completion method of accounting. The percentage-of-completion accounting practice we use results in our recognizing contract revenues and earnings ratably over the contract term in proportion to our incurrence of contract costs, primarily labor. The earnings or losses recognized on individual contracts are based on estimates of contract revenues, costs and profitability. Contract losses are recognized in full when determined, and contract profit estimates are adjusted based on ongoing reviews of contract profitability. Actual collection of contract amounts or change orders could differ from estimated amounts and could result in a reduction or elimination of previously recognized earnings. In certain circumstances, it is possible that such adjustments could be significant.

      We have a backlog of work to be completed on contracts. Orders included in our backlog are represented by customer purchase orders and contracts, which we believe to be firm. Backlog develops as a result of new business taken, which represents the revenue value of new project commitments received by us during a given period. Backlog consists of projects which have either (1) not yet been started or (2) are in progress and are not yet complete. In the latter case, the revenue value reported in backlog is the remaining value associated with work that has not yet been completed. From time to time, projects are canceled that appeared to have a high certainty of going forward at the time they were recorded as new business taken. In the event of a project cancellation, we may be reimbursed for certain costs but typically have no contractual right to the total revenue reflected in our backlog. In addition to being unable to recover certain direct costs, canceled projects may also result in additional unrecoverable costs due to the resulting underutilization of our assets.

      Our quarterly results may be materially and adversely affected by:

      Accordingly, our operating results in any particular quarter may not be indicative of the results that you can expect for any other quarter or for the entire year.

      Our ability to generate internal growth will be affected by, among other factors, our ability to:

      In addition, our customers may reduce the number or size of projects available to us. Many of the factors affecting our ability to generate internal growth may be beyond our control, and we cannot be certain that our strategies will be successful or that we will be able to generate cash flow sufficient to fund our operations and to support internal growth. If we are unsuccessful, we may not be able to achieve internal growth, expand our operations or grow our business.

      We depend on the continued efforts of our executive officers and senior management. We cannot be certain that any individual will continue in such capacity for any particular period of time. The loss of key personnel, or the inability to hire and retain qualified employees, could negatively impact our ability to manage our business.

      Our ability to maintain our productivity and profitability will be limited by our ability to employ, train and retain skilled personnel necessary to meet our requirements. We may experience shortages of qualified personnel. We cannot be certain that we will be able to maintain an adequate skilled labor force necessary to operate efficiently and to support our growth strategy or that our labor expenses will not increase as a result of a shortage in the supply of skilled personnel. Labor shortages or increased labor costs could impair our ability to maintain our business or grow our revenues.

PART I

Overview

      We develop, design, manufacture, and service equipment and systems for the management and control of electrical energy and other critical processes. Headquartered in Houston, Texas, we serve the transportation, environmental, industrial, and utility industries.

      Powell Industries, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “Powell,” or the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware in 2004 as a successor to a Nevada company incorporated in 1968. The Nevada corporation was the successor to a company founded by William E. Powell in 1947, which merged into the Company in 1977. Our major subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned, include: Powell Electrical Systems, Inc., Transdyn, Inc., Powell Industries International, Inc., Switchgear & Instrumentation Limited, and Switchgear & Instrumentation Properties Limited.

      Our website address is www.powellind.com. We make available free of charge on or through our website copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Paper or electronic copies of such material may also be requested by contacting the Company at our corporate offices.

      Our business operations are consolidated into two business segments: Electrical Power Products and Process Control Systems. Approximately 75%, 86% and 84% of our consolidated revenues for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, were generated in the United States of America. Approximately 84% of our long-lived assets were located in the United States at October 31, 2005, with the remaining balance located primarily in the United Kingdom. Financial information related to our business and geographical segments is included in Note L of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

      On July 4, 2005, we acquired selected assets and assumed certain operating liabilities and contracts of Switchgear & Instrumentation Limited in the United Kingdom. We refer to the acquired business herein as “S&I.” The operating results of S&I are included in our Electrical Power Products segment from that date. Total consideration paid for S&I was approximately $19.2 million of which approximately $10.3 million of the purchase price was funded from existing cash and investments and the balance was provided through additional debt financing. For further information on our S&I acquisition, see Note C of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Electrical Power Products

      Our Electrical Power Products segment designs, manufactures, and markets engineered-to-order electrical power management systems designed (1) to distribute, monitor, and control the flow of electrical energy and (2) to provide protection to motors, transformers and other electrically powered equipment. Our principal products include offshore modules, power control room packages, switchgear, motor control centers and bus duct systems. These products are designed for application voltages ranging from 480 volts to in excess of 36,000 volts and are used in the transportation, industrial, and utility markets.

      On July 4, 2005, we acquired selected assets and assumed selected operating liabilities and contracts of Switchgear & Instrumentation Limited in the United Kingdom, as described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Overview. S&I’s primary manufacturing facility is in the United Kingdom. This acquisition is part of the Company’s overall strategy to increase its international presence. S&I affords Powell the opportunity to serve customers with products covering a wider range of electrical standards and opens new geographic markets previously closed due to our lack of product portfolio that met international electrical standards. The fit, culture and market position of Powell and S&I are favorably comparable with similar reputations in engineered-to-order solutions.

      This segment’s principal products are designed for use by and marketed to sophisticated users of large amounts of electrical energy. Our customers include oil and gas producers, oil and gas pipelines, refineries, petrochemical plants, electrical power generators, public and private utilities, mining, pulp and paper mills, transportation systems, governmental agencies, and other large industrial customers.

      Products and services are principally sold directly to the end-user or to an EPC (engineering, procurement and construction) firm on behalf of the end-user. We market and sell our products and services to a wide variety of customers, markets and geographic regions. During each of the past three fiscal years, we did not have any one customer that accounted for more than 10% of annual segment revenues. Accordingly, we do not believe that the loss of any specific customer would have a material adverse effect on our business. While we are not dependent upon any one customer for revenues, we could be adversely impacted by a significant reduction in business volume from a particular industry which we currently serve.

      During each of the past three fiscal years, no one country, except for the United States, accounted for more than 10% of segment revenues. For information on the geographic areas in which our consolidated revenues were recorded in each of the past three years, see Note L of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

      Our Electrical Power Products segment operates in a competitive market where competition for each project varies. The competition may include large multinational firms as well as small regional low-cost providers, depending upon the type of project. This segment’s products and systems are engineered-to-order and designed to meet the exact specifications of our customers. Many repeat customers seek our involvement in finding solutions to specific project-related issues including physical size, rating, application, installation, and commissioning. We consider our engineering, manufacturing, and service capabilities vital to the success of our business, and believe our technical and project management strengths, together with our responsiveness and flexibility to the needs of our customers, give us a competitive advantage in our markets. Ultimately, our competitive position is dependent on the ability to provide quality products and systems on a timely basis at a competitive price.

      Orders in the Electrical Power Products segment backlog at October 31, 2005, totaled $212.9 million compared to $89.5 million at the end of the previous fiscal year. We anticipate that approximately $160 million of our ending 2005 backlog will be fulfilled during our fiscal year 2006. A portion of the increase in backlog relates to a contract totaling approximately $51 million which will be delivered over a four-year period. This contract is with a municipal agency, and production began in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Orders included in our backlog are represented by customer purchase orders and contracts, which we believe to be firm. However, weak economic conditions caused us to experience some customer delays and cancellations of certain projects during 2004 and 2003.

      The principal raw materials used in Electrical Power Products’ operations include steel, copper, aluminum, and various electrical components. These raw material costs represented approximately 51% of our revenues in fiscal 2005. Unanticipated increases in raw material requirements or price increases could increase production costs and adversely affect profitability.

      We purchase certain key electrical components on a sole-source basis and maintain a qualification and performance monitoring program to control risk associated with sole-sourced items. Changes in our design to accommodate similar components from other suppliers could be implemented to resolve a supply problem related to a sole-sourced component. In this circumstance, supply problems could result in short-term delays in our ability to meet commitments to our customers. We believe that sources of supply for raw materials and

components are generally sufficient and have no reason to believe a shortage of raw materials will cause any material adverse impact during fiscal year 2006. While we are not dependent on any one supplier for a material amount of our raw materials, we are highly dependent on our suppliers in order to meet commitments to our customers. We did not experience significant or unusual problems in the purchase of key raw materials and commodities in the past three years.

      This segment is subject to the effects of changing prices. During fiscal 2004 and 2005, we experienced increased costs for certain commodities, in particular steel, copper and aluminum products, which are used in the production of our products. While the cost outlook for commodities used in production of our products is not certain, we believe we can manage these inflationary pressures through contract pricing adjustments and by actively pursuing internal cost reduction efforts. We have not entered into any derivative contracts to hedge our exposure to commodity price changes in fiscal years 2005, 2004, or 2003.

      At October 31, 2005, the Electrical Power Products segment had 1,390 full-time employees located in the United States, the United Kingdom and Singapore. Our employees are not represented by unions, and we believe that our relationship with employees is good.

      This segment’s research and development activities are directed toward the development of new products and processes as well as improvements in existing products and processes. Research and development expenditures were $2.1 million, $2.7 million and $2.9 million in fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      While we are the holder of various patents, trademarks, and licenses relating to this segment, we do not consider any individual intellectual property to be material to our consolidated business operations.

Process Control Systems

      Our Process Control Systems segment designs and delivers technology solutions that help our customers manage their critical transportation, environmental, energy, industrial and utility facilities. We offer a diverse set of professional services that specialize in the design, integration, and support of high-availability control, security/surveillance, and communications systems. The systems allow our customers to safely and effectively manage their vital processes and facilities.

      This segment’s products and services are principally sold directly to end-users in the transportation, environmental, energy, and industrial sectors. We may be dependent on one specific contract or customer for a significant percentage of our revenues due to the nature of large, long-term construction projects common to this segment. For example, during 2003, we received a contract to design and build Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which accounted for 16% of segment revenues in fiscal 2003 and 44% in both fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005. In each of the past three fiscal years, we had revenues with one customer that individually accounted for more than 10% of our segment revenues. Revenues from these customers totaled $17.1 million, $14.8 million, and $4.8 million in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Our contracts often represent large-scale, single-need projects with an individual customer. By their nature, these projects are typically nonrecurring for those customers, and multiple and/or continuous requirements of similar magnitude with the same customer are rare. Thus, the inability to successfully replace a completed large contract with one or more of combined similar magnitude could have a material adverse effect on segment revenues.

      During each of the past three fiscal years, no one country, except for the United States, accounted for more than 10% of segment revenues. For information on the geographic areas in which our consolidated revenues were recorded in each of the past three years, see Note L of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

      This segment operates in a competitive market where competition for each contract varies. The competition may include large multinational firms, as well as small regional low-cost providers, depending upon the type of system and customer requirements.

      Our customized systems are designed to meet the specifications of our customers. Each order is designed, delivered, and installed to the unique requirements of the particular application. We consider our engineering, systems integration, installation, and support capabilities vital to the success of our business. We believe our technical, software products, and project management strengths, together with our responsiveness, our flexibility, financial strength, and our over thirty-year history of supporting mission-critical systems give us a competitive advantage in our markets.

      Orders in the Process Control Systems segment backlog at October 31, 2005 totaled $46.1 million compared to $44.8 million at the end of the previous fiscal year. We anticipate that approximately $22 million of our ending 2005 backlog will be fulfilled during our fiscal year 2006. As of October 31, 2005, $5.7 million of our ending backlog relates to the ITS contract described in “Customers and Markets,” above. Orders included in our backlog are represented by customer purchase orders and contracts, which we believe to be firm. We have not experienced a material amount of canceled orders during the past three fiscal years.

      The Process Control Systems segment had 110 full-time employees at October 31, 2005, all located in the United States. Our employees are not represented by unions and we believe that our relationship with employees is good.

      The majority of research and development activities of this segment are directed toward the development of our software suites for the management and control of the critical processes and facilities of our customers. Research and development expenditures were $0.7 million, $0.8 million and $0.7 million in fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      While we are the holder of various copyrights related to software for this segment, we do not consider any individual intellectual property to be material to our consolidated business operations.

      We have manufacturing facilities, sales offices, field offices, and repair centers located throughout the United States, and we have a manufacturing facility in the United Kingdom. We also rent manufacturing space in Singapore on an as needed basis. Our facilities are generally located in areas that are readily accessible to raw materials and labor pools and are maintained in good condition. These facilities, together with recent expansions, are expected to meet our needs for the foreseeable future.

      Our principal manufacturing locations by segment as of October 31, 2005, are as follows:

      We also own one idle facility, located in Elyria, Ohio, consisting of manufacturing and office space. We anticipate that we will sell this property during the coming year. As this property is held for sale, the $0.8 million of related net book value is included in other current assets at October 31, 2005. This facility was previously used to manufacture our nonsegregated bus duct product line, which has been consolidated into another existing Company facility.

      All leased properties are subject to long-term leases with remaining lease terms ranging from one to four years as of October 31, 2005. We do not anticipate experiencing significant difficulty in retaining occupancy of any of our leased facilities through lease renewals prior to expiration or through month-to-month occupancy, or in replacing them with equivalent facilities.

      We previously entered into a construction joint venture agreement to supply, install and commission a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System (“SCADA”) to monitor and control the distribution and delivery of fresh water under a contract with the City of San Francisco Public Utility Commission (“Commission”). The project was substantially completed and has been performing to the satisfaction of the Commission. However, various factors outside of our control and the control of our joint venture partner caused numerous changes and additions to the work that in turn delayed the completion of the project. The Commission has withheld liquidated damages and earned contract payments from the joint venture. We have made claims against the Commission for various matters, including compensation for extra work and delay to the project. We are currently pursuing the recovery of amounts owed under the contract, as well as legal and other costs incurred to defend our claim. Unless the matter is otherwise resolved, this claim is scheduled to go to trial in the first half of 2006.

      As of October 31, 2005, we had approximately $1.4 million recorded in our consolidated balance sheet for contractually owed amounts in accounts receivable and costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts related to our portion of this contract. Consistent with our policy, only costs of directed change orders have been recorded by the Company. During the last two fiscal years, the Company’s gross profit has been reduced by approximately $2.9 million in fiscal 2005 and $0.9 million in fiscal 2004 related to direct costs, including legal fees, related to this dispute. We have not recorded any amounts related to our claims and counterclaims alleging breach of the agreement. Although a failure to recover the amounts recorded could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, we believe that, under the circumstances and on the basis of information now available, an unfavorable outcome is unlikely.

      We did not submit any matter to a vote of our stockholders during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005.

PART II

Price Range of Common Stock

      Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “POWL.” The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices per share as reported on the NASDAQ National Market for our common stock.

      As of January 12, 2006, the last reported sales price of our common stock on the NASDAQ National Market was $18.29 per share. As of January 12, 2006, there were 624 stockholders of record of our common stock. All common stock held in broker accounts are included as one stockholder of record.

      See Part III, Item 12 for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plan.

Dividend Policy

      Our current credit agreement limits the payment of dividends, other than dividends payable solely in our capital stock, without prior consent of our lenders. To date, we have not paid cash dividends on our common stock, and for the foreseeable future we intend to retain earnings for the development of our business. Future decisions to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon our results of operations, financial condition and capital expenditure plans, along with other relevant factors.

      The selected financial data shown below for the past five years was derived from our audited financial statements. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected in the future. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

      On July 4, 2005, we acquired selected assets and assumed certain operating liabilities and contracts of Switchgear & Instrumentation Limited in the United Kingdom. We refer to the acquired business as “S&I.” The operating results of S&I are included from that date.

      The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes. Any forward-looking statements made by or on our behalf are made pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Readers are cautioned that such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties in that the actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. For a description of the risks and uncertainties, please see “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements; Risk Factors” contained in this Form 10-K.

Overview

      We have experienced a marked improvement in market demand for our products and services. In fiscal 2005, our markets improved considerably over the difficult market conditions that existed in fiscal 2003 and 2004. Additionally, market price levels are beginning to improve as the overall volume of business activity has increased. We believe this improvement in the market should benefit our operating results in fiscal 2006.

      This past year, we significantly enhanced our international presence and improved our capability to serve our existing base of global customers. On July 4, 2005, we acquired certain assets and assumed certain operating liabilities and contracts of Switchgear & Instrumentation, Limited. Total consideration paid for S&I was approximately $18.0 million (excluding expenses of approximately $1.2 million). Approximately $10.3 million of the purchase price was funded from existing cash and investments, and the balance was provided through additional debt financing. S&I’s primary manufacturing facility is located in the United Kingdom. S&I is a supplier of medium and low voltage switchgear, intelligent motor control systems and power distribution solutions to a wide range of process industries with a focus on oil and gas, petrochemical, and other process-related industries. The operating results of S&I are included in our Electrical Power Products Segment from the acquisition date. Additional information concerning this acquisition, related debt and business segments is included in Notes C, H and L, respectively, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We anticipate opportunities outside of the United States to continue to grow, and with the integration with our U.S. operations, S&I is expected to significantly improve our ability to support the worldwide investment in oil and gas production, refineries and petrochemical facilities.

      Beginning in late fiscal 2004, our principal markets of heavy industry and utilities entered into a new investment cycle. Customer inquiries, or requests for proposals, steadily strengthened during the second half of fiscal 2004 which led to a strengthening in new orders in fiscal 2005. One of the positive trends we have experienced is an increase in new order activity. Orders received during the second half of fiscal 2005 totaled $226.8 million versus $104.5 million in the same period a year ago. We currently anticipate that this higher level of business activity will continue into fiscal 2006.

      During 2005, we completed a consolidation plan to reduce the number of facilities in our Electrical Power Products segment. This consolidation has reduced our overhead costs and improved our operating efficiencies. In the first three months of 2005, we incurred start-up difficulties and inefficiencies as a result of relocating some of our product lines. These transition inefficiencies have now been resolved, and fiscal 2006 should benefit from these consolidations. During the second half of 2005, we completed our evaluation and selection of a new Enterprise Resource Planning System (“ERP System”). Implementation at each of our U.S. Electrical Power Products operations is planned by the end of fiscal 2006. The implementation of a new ERP System will provide the tools needed to redesign, streamline and standardize our business processes across the business segment with the goal of improving efficiencies and reducing costs of operations.

Results of Operations

      Consolidated revenues increased 24.5% to $256.6 million in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004 revenues of $206.1 million. Revenues increased primarily due to general market recovery, a concerted sales effort aimed at strengthening our backlog and our acquisition of S&I in July 2005. The S&I acquisition added revenues of $19.9 million, all outside the United States, in fiscal 2005. For the twelve months ended October 31, 2005, revenues in the United States increased by 8% to $191.7 million. Revenues outside of the United States were $64.9 million in fiscal 2005 compared to $29.0 million in the prior year, primarily due to our acquisition of S&I. Revenues outside of the United States accounted for 25% of consolidated revenues in fiscal 2005 compared to 14% in fiscal 2004, primarily due to our acquisition of S&I.

      Our Electrical Power Products segment recorded revenues of $220.1 million in fiscal 2005, which includes revenues of $19.9 million from our July 2005 acquisition of S&I, compared to $173.5 million for the previous year. During fiscal 2005, revenues from utility markets and from industrial customers strengthened compared to the prior year. In fiscal 2005, revenues from public and private utilities were approximately $78.4 million, an increase of $19.6 million compared to fiscal 2004. Revenues from industrial customers totaled $133.1 million in fiscal 2005, a 36% increase over the prior year. Municipal and transit projects generated revenues of $8.6 million in fiscal 2005 compared to $16.7 million a year ago.

      The Electrical Power Products segment reported gross profit, as a percentage of revenues, of 15.2% in fiscal 2005, compared to 16.8% in fiscal 2004. Material costs for basic commodities increased $1.5 million in fiscal 2005 compared to a year ago, primarily due to higher unit prices for copper, aluminum and steel. In addition, gross profit margins were adversely impacted in fiscal 2005 due to competitive pricing pressures as a result of depressed market levels when projects were bid in previous periods. Gross profit in fiscal 2004 was adversely impacted by one-time expenses of $1.8 million associated with our decision to close certain underutilized operating facilities. These expenses included employee severance, training and equipment relocation costs.

      Revenues in our Process Control Systems segment increased to $36.5 million in fiscal 2005 from $32.7 million in fiscal 2004. The strength of our revenues is related, in part, to our contract to design and build the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) for the Holland and Lincoln tunnels. Revenues in fiscal 2005 also include $1.7 million related to the favorable settlement of a claim which was not recorded by the Company related to the Central Artery Tunnel Project as discussed in Note K of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

      Segment gross profit, as a percentage of revenues, improved to 28.7% in fiscal 2005 compared to 21.0% in fiscal 2004. This increase in gross profit margin can be attributed to improved execution on a number of projects nearing completion and the recovery of previously recognized costs on the Central Artery Tunnel Project. Additionally, gross profit was negatively impacted by approximately $2.9 million in 2005 and $0.9 million in 2004 related primarily to legal costs incurred related to the recovery of amounts owed on a previously completed contract.

      For additional information related to our business segments, see Note L of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

      Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses increased 18.1% to $41.8 million in fiscal 2005 compared to $35.4 million in fiscal 2004. Approximately 33% of this increase is related to the business activities of S&I, acquired in July 2005. Commission expenses for sales representatives as well as direct sales expenses increased by approximately $1.7 million in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004 due to the concerted effort to increase revenues and backlog discussed above. Accounting and professional fees have increased by $1.5 million primarily due to costs incurred for Sarbanes-Oxley compliance and costs associated with on-going acquisition activities. These increases in selling, general and administrative costs were partially offset by one-time costs incurred in fiscal 2004 of approximately $0.4 million and reduced costs in 2005 resulting from the closing of certain manufacturing facilities. Additionally, research and development expenditures decreased to $2.8 million in fiscal 2005 from $3.5 million last year. Selling, general and administrative expenses have also increased due to the commensurate increase in revenue.

      Interest expense increased by $0.6 million to $0.7 million in fiscal 2005. This increase is primarily related to interest on debt incurred in July 2005 related to our acquisition of S&I and interest payments to state taxing authorities.

      We earned approximately $1.1 million of interest income in fiscal 2005 compared to approximately $0.9 million in fiscal 2004. Interest income increased primarily due to higher market interest rates in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004.

      Our provision for income taxes reflects an effective tax rate on earnings before income taxes of 33.0% in fiscal 2005 compared to a benefit of 20.7% in fiscal 2004.

      During 2005 and 2004, we recorded several tax adjustments related to the following items:

      In fiscal 2005, we generated net income of $2.3 million, or $0.21 per diluted share, compared to net income of $1.7 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, in fiscal 2004. Higher gross profits from our Process Control Systems business segment and S&I, our sale of land and building, partially offset by higher selling, general, and administrative expenses and interest expense have contributed to the overall increase in net income in fiscal 2005 compared to the prior year.

      The order backlog on October 31, 2005, was $259.0 million, compared to $134.3 million at fiscal year end 2004, an increase of 93%. Orders included in backlog are represented by customer purchase orders and contracts, which we believe to be firm. New orders placed during the year totaled $360.5 million compared to $182.9 million in fiscal 2004. A portion of the increase in backlog relates to a contract totaling approximately $51 million over a four-year period. This contract is with a municipal agency and production began in the first quarter of fiscal 2006.

      Consolidated revenues decreased 19% to $206.1 million in fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal year 2003 revenues of $253.4 million. Domestic revenues decreased $36.5 million to $177.1 million in 2004 compared to 2003. Revenues outside of the United States accounted for 14% of consolidated revenues in fiscal 2004 compared to 16% in 2003.

      Our Electrical Power Products segment recorded revenues of $173.5 million in fiscal 2004 compared to $227.0 million in fiscal 2003. Customers had been reluctant to commit to new capital construction projects throughout fiscal 2004 due to economic uncertainty. However, we were able to expand revenues related to system modification and equipment replacement as customers looked for ways to extend the lives of existing systems. Overall, we experienced a decline in revenues in each of our major markets. Revenues from industrial customers were $98.0 million in 2004 compared to $125.0 million in 2003. Utility revenues were $59.0 million in 2004 compared to $79.0 million in 2003. Municipal and transit projects generated revenues of $17.0 million compared to $23.0 million in 2003.

      Gross profit, as a percentage of revenues, decreased to 16.8% in fiscal 2004 from 18.8% in fiscal 2003. Fiscal 2004 costs of goods sold included one-time expenses of $1.8 million to consolidate our operations. Consolidation expenses included employee severance, training and equipment relocation costs. Inflationary pressures, primarily due to higher commodity prices in copper, aluminum and steel increased direct material expenses by approximately 4%, or $3.3 million, compared to fiscal 2003.

      Both revenue and gross profit have been adversely impacted by competitive pricing in a depressed marketplace. Partially offsetting adverse market conditions have been the results of our efforts to reduce our production overhead costs by improving operating efficiencies through the implementation of lean initiatives.

      Revenues in our Process Control Systems segment increased 24% to $32.7 million compared to $26.4 million in fiscal 2003. The increase in revenue was primarily attributed to our contract to design and build Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) for the Holland and Lincoln tunnels for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. This contract accounted for $14.3 million of segment revenues in fiscal 2004 and $4.2 million in fiscal 2003. At October 31, 2004, the remaining value associated with this project in backlog was $19.5 million, or 44% of segment backlog, which was expected to be recognized as revenue in 2005. Export revenue increased to $0.8 million in fiscal 2004 from $0.7 million in fiscal 2003.

      Segment gross profit, as a percentage of revenues, was 21.0% in fiscal 2004, compared to 23.5% in fiscal year 2003. Gross profits as a percentage of revenues were reduced in 2004 due to the large amount of subcontract work and material pass-through purchases on the Holland and Lincoln tunnels contract which typically generates significantly lower profits compared to our other professional services.

      For additional information related to our business segments, see Note L of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

      Selling, general and administrative expenses were $35.4 million, or 17.2% of revenues, in fiscal 2004 compared to $35.3 million, or 13.9% of revenues, in fiscal 2003. In fiscal 2004, accounting and auditing fees increased $0.8 million compared to 2003, primarily attributable to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance efforts. One-time consolidation expenses of $0.4 million were incurred in fiscal 2004. These expenses were costs associated with actions to consolidate our operations and close certain facilities which represented excess capacity. The benefit of lower operating overheads should be realized beginning in 2005. Excluding the impact of these increases, selling, general and administrative expenses would have decreased consistent with revenues.

      Research and development expenditures were $3.5 million in 2004 compared to $3.6 million in fiscal 2003. Our research efforts were directed toward the discovery and development of new products and processes, as well as improvements in existing products and processes. Research and development costs are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

      We incurred $0.1 million in interest expense in fiscal 2004 compared to $0.4 million in fiscal 2003. Interest expense was reduced by favorable interest rates and a decreased balance on our industrial revenue bond debt. Our industrial revenue bonds have scheduled payments of $0.4 million that become due each year in October. Additionally, in fiscal 2003, we incurred $0.2 million in interest expense on our term loan and the associated interest rate swap. In September 2003, we paid the remaining principal balance on our term loan, which reduced our interest expense.

      We earned $0.9 million in interest income in fiscal 2004 compared to $0.6 million in the previous year. Interest income increased primarily due to higher levels of invested funds.

      Our income tax provision/(benefit) for fiscal 2004 and 2003 was ($0.3 million) and $6.1 million, and our effective tax rate was (21%) and 45%, respectively. During 2004, we recorded several tax adjustments related to the following items:

      Without these adjustments, our 2004 effective tax rate would have been 40%.

      Net income was $1.7 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, in fiscal year 2004 compared to $7.0 million, or $0.65 per diluted share, in fiscal year 2003. The decrease in net income primarily related to lower business volume and decreased gross profits in fiscal 2004. Gross profits declined as a result of one-time consolidation costs, inflationary pressures on materials costs, and depressed market price levels. Partially offsetting lower gross profits were higher interest income and a net income tax benefit.

      In fiscal 2003, net income was negatively impacted as a result of our adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” During the first quarter of fiscal 2003, we recorded a goodwill impairment loss of $0.5 million as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The goodwill impairment charge accounted for a loss of $0.05 per diluted share in 2003.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      We have maintained a positive liquidity position. Working capital was $103.4 million at October 31, 2005, compared to $99.3 million at October 31, 2004. As of October 31, 2005, current assets exceeded current liabilities by 2.8 times and our debt to total capitalization ratio was 13.05%.

      At October 31, 2005, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $33.0 million, compared to $63.2 million at October 31, 2004. Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, including current maturities, totaled $21.5 million at October 31, 2005, compared to $7.1 million at October 31, 2004. In addition to our long-term debt, we have a $22 million revolving credit agreement in support of our U.S. debt requirements and an additional £4 million (approximately $7.0 million) revolving credit agreement in the United Kingdom, both of which expire June 2008. As of October 31, 2005, there was approximately

$4.3 million borrowed under these lines of credit. For further information regarding our debt, see Note H of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

      During fiscal 2005, cash used in operating activities was $21.2 million, compared to cash provided by operations of $24.9 million and $36.7 million during 2004 and 2003, respectively. This reduction in cash was principally used to fund the growth in accounts receivable, inventories and costs related to uncompleted contracts which have not been billed. This use of cash has resulted from the need for increased levels of working capital needed to support increased levels of business activity. During fiscal 2004 and 2003, operating activities provided net cash of $24.9 million and $36.7 million, respectively, of which $19.9 million and $22.5 million, respectively, resulted from a reduction in operating assets and liabilities with the remainder of the increase related to net earnings adjusted for depreciation, amortization, and other noncash expenses. Lower levels of business activity in 2004 and 2003 resulted in lower levels of working capital required to support operating needs.

      Investments in property, plant and equipment during fiscal 2005 totaled $6.1 million compared to $6.5 million and $4.5 million in fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively. The majority of our 2005 capital investments were used to improve our capabilities to manufacture switchgear and electrical power control rooms as well as initial investments in a new ERP system. We have committed to capital projects totaling $5.3 million to acquire and implement an ERP system at our domestic Electrical Power Products operations. As of the end of fiscal 2005, we have incurred costs of $2.5 million on this project. We expect to incur the balance during 2006. In 2005, investing activities included costs of $19.2 million for the acquisition of S&I. During 2004 and 2003, the majority of our capital expenditures were used to increase our manufacturing capabilities to produce switchgear, electrical power control and power control modules.

      Proceeds from the sale of fixed assets provided cash of $0.9 million and $1.8 million in fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively, primarily from the sale of idled manufacturing facilities. In fiscal 2005, we sold property located in Greenville, Texas, which was idled in 2004; and in fiscal 2004, we sold property located in Franklin Park, Illinois, which was idled in 2002.

      Net proceeds from the sale and purchase of marketable securities were $46.0 million in fiscal 2005 compared to cash used to purchase marketable securities of $22.6 million in 2004. Marketable securities were sold to finance working capital requirements of the business in fiscal 2005. During 2003, net cash of $25.7 million was used to purchase various types of marketable securities as a result of positive operating cash flow in 2003.

      Net cash provided by financing activities was $15.4 million in fiscal 2005 compared to net cash provided of $0.6 million and net cash used of $4.0 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. The primary source of cash from financing activities was proceeds from borrowings of $10.6 million under the term loan associated with our acquisition and proceeds from the exercise of stock options. The primary source of cash from financing in fiscal 2004 was from the exercise of stock options. In September 2003, we paid the remaining principal balance on an existing term loan. The repayment of this loan was the primary use of cash for financing activities in fiscal 2003.

      At October 31, 2005, our long-term contractual obligations were limited to debt and leases. The table below details our commitments by type of obligation, including interest if applicable, and the period that the payment will become due (in thousands).

      The following table reflects other commercial commitments or potential cash outflows that may result from a contingent event (in thousands).

      We are contingently liable for secured and unsecured letters of credit of $12.6 million as of October 31, 2005, of which $12.2 million reduces our borrowing capacity. We also had performance bonds totaling approximately $176.5 million that were outstanding at October 31, 2005. Performance bonds are used to guarantee contract performance to our customers.

Outlook for Fiscal 2006

      We expect the recent improvement in our principal markets to continue into 2006. Customer inquiries, or requests for proposals, steadily strengthened during the second half of fiscal 2004 which led to a strengthening in new orders in fiscal 2005. One of the positive trends we have experienced is an increase in new order activity. Orders received during the second half of fiscal 2005 totaled $226.8 million versus $104.5 million in the same period a year ago. We currently anticipate that this higher level of business activity will continue into fiscal 2006.

      In our Electrical Power Products segment, third and fourth quarter orders increased both sequentially and year over year. In addition, we will benefit from a full year of revenue and earnings contribution from our acquisition of S&I. Although our Process Controls Systems segment continues to experience soft market conditions, we anticipate that increased funding for municipal projects will be available as general economic conditions strengthen. We believe we will be well positioned to take advantage of improving economic conditions.

      We anticipate that we will continue to reinvest a portion of our cash generated from operations into working capital in fiscal 2006. Working capital needs are anticipated to increase with growing levels of business activity. We believe that working capital, borrowing capabilities, and funds generated from operations

will be sufficient to finance anticipated operational activities, capital improvements, debt repayment and possible future acquisitions for the foreseeable future. Any strategic acquisition of a new business(es) or product line(s) could require additional borrowings.

Effects of Inflation

      The pace of new orders significantly strengthened as 2005 progressed and we ended the year with an order rate that we have not experienced since 2002. We anticipate that these conditions will continue into 2006. This is a marked improvement over 2003 and 2004 in which we experienced a significant deterioration in business volume due to the effects of the U.S. economy on our markets and customers. During those years, new investments in infrastructure projects were curtailed in both our utility and industrial market segments, and our municipal customers faced a reduced tax base with which to fund infrastructure projects. Beginning in 2004, there were indications of an improving U.S. economy, and new business inquiry levels strengthened throughout 2005.

      We have experienced significant price pressures with our key raw materials, primarily copper, aluminum and steel since the U.S. economy began to show signs of improvement in 2004. Competitive market pressures limited our ability to pass these cost increases to our customers. These competing pressures eroded our earnings in 2004 and 2005. We anticipate that these inflationary pressures will continue to adversely impact our operations in 2006.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

      The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates. We believe the following accounting policies and estimates to be critical in the preparation and reporting of our consolidated financial statements.

      Our revenues are primarily generated from engineering and manufacturing of custom products under long-term contracts that may last from one month to several years, depending on the contract. Revenues from long-term contracts are recognized on the percentage-of-completion method of accounting as provided by the American Institute for Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts,” (“SOP 81-1”).

      Under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, revenues are recognized as work is performed based on the estimated completion to date calculated by multiplying the total contract price by percentage of performance to date, based on total labor dollars or hours incurred to date to the total estimated labor dollars or hours estimated at completion. Application of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting requires the use of estimates of costs to be incurred for the performance of the contract. Contract costs include all direct material, direct labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs and all costs associated with operation of equipment (excluding depreciation). The cost estimation process is based upon the professional knowledge and experience of the Company’s engineers, project managers, and financial professionals. Factors that are considered in estimating the work to be completed and ultimate contract recovery include the availability and productivity of labor, the nature and complexity of the work to be performed, the effect of change orders, the availability of materials, the effect of any delays in performance and the recoverability of any claims. Changes in job performance, job conditions, estimated profitability, and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income and their effects are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Whenever revisions of estimated contract costs and contract values indicate that the contract costs will exceed estimated revenues, thus creating a loss, a provision for the total estimated loss is recorded in that period.

      Revenues associated with maintenance, repair and service contracts are recognized when the services are performed in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition, Revised and Updated.” Expenses related to these types of services are recognized as incurred.

      We maintain and continually assess the adequacy of an allowance for doubtful accounts representing our estimate for losses resulting from the inability of our customers to pay amounts due to us. This estimated allowance is based on historical experience of uncollected accounts, the level of past due accounts, the overall level of outstanding accounts receivable, information about specific customers with respect to their inability to make payments and expectations of future conditions that could impact the collectibility of accounts receivable. However, future changes in our customers’ operating performance and cash flows or in general economic conditions could have an impact on their ability to fully pay these amounts, which could have a material impact on our operating results.

      We have significant investments in long-lived assets, including property and equipment and goodwill. We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying amount of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be fully recoverable. We also evaluate potential impairment of goodwill on an annual basis. The review for impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill takes into account estimates of future cash flows. Our estimates of future cash flows are based upon budgets and longer-range plans. These budgets and plans are used for internal purposes and are also the basis for communication with outside parties about future business trends. While we believe the assumptions we use to estimate future cash flows are reasonable, there can be no assurance that the expected future cash flows will be realized. As a result, impairment charges that possibly should have been recognized in earlier periods may not be recognized until later periods if actual cash flows deviate unfavorably from earlier estimates. For assets held for sale or disposal, the fair value of the asset is measured using quoted market prices or an estimation of net realizable value. Based on general economic conditions and conditions specific to our industry, the ultimate amounts realized on assets held for sale may differ materially from their currently estimated realizable values.

      From time to time, contingencies, such as insurance and legal claims, arise in the normal course of business. Pursuant to current accounting standards, we must evaluate such contingencies to subjectively determine the likelihood that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements, as well as evaluating whether the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. If the likelihood is determined to be probable and it can be reasonably estimated, the estimated loss is recorded. The amounts we record for insurance claims, warranties, legal and other contingent liabilities require judgments regarding the amount of expenses that will ultimately be incurred. We use past experience and history, as well as the specific circumstances surrounding each contingent liability, in evaluating the amount of liability that should be recorded. Actual results could differ from our estimates.

      We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. This approach requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Developing our provision for income taxes requires significant judgment and expertise in federal and state income tax laws, regulations and strategies, including the determination of deferred tax assets and liabilities and, if necessary, any valuation allowances that may be required for deferred tax assets. We have not recorded any other valuation allowances as of October 31, 2005 because we believe that future taxable income will, more likely than not, be sufficient to realize the benefits of those assets as the temporary differences in basis reverse over time. Our judgments and tax strategies are subject to audit by various taxing authorities.

      The functional currency for our foreign subsidiaries is the local currency in which the entity is located. The financial statements of all subsidiaries with a functional currency other than the U.S. Dollar have been translated into U.S. Dollars in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation.” All assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into U.S. Dollars using year-end exchange rates, and all revenues and expenses are translated at average rates during the respective period. The U.S. Dollar results that arise from such translation, as well as exchange gains and losses on intercompany balances of a long-term investment nature, are included in the cumulative currency translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity.

      SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended and interpreted, requires that each derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or a liability and measured at its fair value. The statement also requires that changes in the derivative’s fair value be recognized currently in earnings in either income (loss) from continuing operations or accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), depending on whether the derivative qualifies for hedge accounting treatment.

      On July 14, 2005, we entered into a forward foreign exchange contract with a notional amount of 2.1 million Canadian Dollars maturing on December 23, 2005. This foreign currency derivative qualifies for and is classified as a fair value hedge. The purpose of our foreign currency hedging activities is to protect us from the risk that the eventual cash flows resulting from transactions in foreign currencies will be adversely affected by changes in exchange rates. Changes in fair values of outstanding fair value hedge derivatives that are effective are recorded in other comprehensive income, until net income is affected by the variability of cash flows of the hedged transaction. In most cases, amounts recorded in other comprehensive income will be released to net income sometime after the maturity of the related derivative. Gains and losses on these contracts are deferred and recognized as adjustments to either the basis of those assets or foreign exchange gains/losses, as applicable. At October 31, 2005, the fair value of the forward swap contract resulted in an unrealized loss of approximately $44,000. This contract matured on December 23, 2005, resulting in a realized foreign exchange loss of $65,000.

New Accounting Pronouncements

      In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“123(R)”), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” which requires companies to measure all employee stock-based compensation awards using a fair value method and record such expense in their consolidated financial statements. The provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) are effective for the first annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. We will adopt this standard at the beginning of fiscal 2006 and will elect the modified-prospective transition method. Under the modified-prospective method, awards that are granted, modified, repurchased or canceled after the date of adoption should be measured and accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R). Awards that are granted prior to the effective date should continue to be accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123, except that stock option expense for unvested options must be recognized in the income statement. The impact of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on, among other things, levels of share-based payments granted in the future, the market value of our common stock as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, our stock price, volatility, and employee stock option exercise behaviors and the related tax impact. However, had we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) in prior periods, we believe the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of SFAS No. 123 as described in the section in Note D to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements titled “Stock-Based Compensation” disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share.

      We are exposed to certain market risks arising from transactions we have entered into in the normal course of business. These risks primarily relate to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices.

Interest Rate Risk

      We are subject to market risk resulting from changes in interest rates related to our outstanding debt and investments in marketable debt securities. Regarding our various debt instruments outstanding at October 31, 2005, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates would result in a total annual increase in interest expense of approximately $200,000. Our investments in marketable debt securities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet, with unrealized gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income. Changes in interest rates will affect the fair value of the marketable securities as reported. While we do not currently have any derivative contracts to hedge our exposure to interest rate risk, we have in the past and may in the future enter into such contracts. Overall, we believe that changes in interest rates will not have a material near-term impact on our future earnings or cash flows. During each of the past three years, we have not experienced a significant effect on our business due to changes in interest rates.

Foreign Currency Transaction Risk

      Amounts invested in our foreign operations are translated into U.S. Dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the fiscal year. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity, in our consolidated balance sheets. We believe the exposure to the effects that fluctuating foreign currencies have on our consolidated results of operations is limited because the foreign operations primarily invoice customers and collect obligations in their respective currencies or U.S. Dollars. Additionally, expenses associated with these transactions are generally contracted and paid for in the same local currencies.

      On July 14, 2005, we entered into a forward foreign exchange contract with a notional amount of 2.1 million Canadian Dollars to mature on December 23, 2005. This foreign currency derivative qualifies for and is classified as a foreign currency fair value hedge. The purpose of our foreign currency hedging activities is to protect us from the risk that the eventual cash flows resulting from transactions in foreign currencies will be adversely affected by changes in exchange rates. Changes in fair values of outstanding fair value hedge derivatives that are highly effective are recorded in other comprehensive income, until net income is affected by the variability of cash flows of the hedged transaction. In most cases, amounts recorded in other comprehensive income will be released to net income sometime after the maturity of the related derivative. Gains and losses on these contracts are deferred and recognized as adjustments to either the basis of those assets or foreign exchange gains/ losses, as applicable. At October 31, 2005, the fair value of the forward swap contract resulted in an unrealized loss of approximately $44,000. This contract matured on December 23, 2005 resulting in a realized foreign exchange loss of approximately $65,000.

Commodity Price Risk

      We are subject to market risk from fluctuating market prices of certain raw materials. While such materials are typically available from numerous suppliers, commodity raw materials are subject to price fluctuations. We attempt to pass along such commodity price increases to our customers on a contract-by-contract basis to avoid profit margin erosion. While we may do so in the future, we have not entered into any derivative contracts to hedge our exposure to commodity risk in fiscal 2005. We continue to experience price increases with some of our key raw materials. Competitive market pressures limited our ability to pass these cost increases to our customers, thus eroding our earnings in fiscal 2005. Fluctuations in commodity prices may have a material near-term effect on our future earnings and cash flows.

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Powell Industries, Inc.:

      We have completed an integrated audit of Powell Industries, Inc.’s 2005 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2005 and an audit of its 2004 consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.

Consolidated financial statements

      In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Powell Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries at October 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Internal control over financial reporting

      Also, in our opinion, management’s assessment, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2005 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

      A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of

unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

      Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

      As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management has excluded Switchgear & Instrumentation Limited and Switchgear & Instrumentation Properties Limited from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2005 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during the year ended October 31, 2005. We have also excluded Switchgear & Instrumentation Limited and Switchgear & Instrumentation Properties Limited from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Switchgear & Instrumentation Limited and Switchgear & Instrumentation Properties Limited are wholly-owned subsidiaries whose total revenues and total assets represent 8% and 15%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended October 31, 2005.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Houston, Texas

January 13, 2006

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Powell Industries, Inc.:

      We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Powell Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) for the year ended October 31, 2003. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

      We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, such 2003 consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the year ended October 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston, Texas

December 19, 2003

the lease expense included in Note K)

POWELL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

POWELL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

POWELL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

POWELL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

POWELL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

      We develop, design, manufacture, and service equipment and systems for the management and control of electrical energy and other critical processes. Headquartered in Houston, Texas, we serve the transportation, environmental, industrial, and utility industries.

      Powell Industries, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “Powell,” or the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware in 2004 as a successor to a Nevada company incorporated in 1968. The Nevada corporation was the successor to a company founded by William E. Powell in 1947, which merged into the Company in 1977. Our major subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned, include: Powell Electrical Systems, Inc., Transdyn, Inc., Powell Industries International, Inc., Switchgear & Instrumentation Limited and Switchgear & Instrumentation Properties Limited.

      On July 4, 2005, we acquired selected assets and assumed certain operating liabilities and contracts of Switchgear & Instrumentation Limited in the United Kingdom. We refer to the acquired business herein as “S&I.” The operating results of S&I are included from this date.

      The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Powell Industries, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The financial position and results of operation of our Singapore joint venture, in which we acquired a majority ownership on August 1, 2004, have been consolidated since August 1, 2004. As a result of this consolidation, we recorded minority interest on our balance sheet for our joint venture partner’s share of equity. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes. The amounts we record for insurance claims, warranties, legal and other contingent liabilities require judgments regarding the amount of expenses that will ultimately be incurred. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions, as well as the specific circumstances surrounding these contingent liabilities in evaluating the amount of liability that should be recorded. Estimates may change as new events occur, additional information becomes available or operating environments change. Actual results may differ from our estimates. The most significant estimates used in the Company’s financial statements affect revenue and cost recognition for construction contracts, the allowance for doubtful accounts, self-insurance, warranty accruals, and postretirement benefit obligations.

      Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, deposits with banks and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

POWELL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Marketable securities consist of variable rate money market accounts that are classified as available-for-sale. These investments are carried at fair value. The maturity dates of these investments as of October 31, 2005 range from 18 to 25 years.

      Financial instruments include short-term investments, marketable securities and debt obligations. Due to the short-term nature of the investments, the book value is representative of their fair value. The carrying value of debt approximates fair value as interest rates are indexed to LIBOR or the bank’s prime rate.

      Accounts receivable are stated net of allowances for doubtful accounts. We maintain and continually assess the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts representing our estimate for losses resulting from the inability of our customers to pay amounts due to us. This estimated allowance is based on historical experience of uncollected accounts, the level of past due accounts, the overall level of outstanding accounts receivable, information about specific customers with respect to their inability to make payments and expectations of future conditions that could impact the collectibility of accounts receivable. Future changes in our customers’ operating performance and cash flows or in general economic conditions could have an impact on their ability to fully pay these amounts, which could have a material impact on our operating results. In most cases, receivables are not collateralized. However, we utilize letters of credit to secure payment on sales when possible. At October 31, 2005 and 2004, accounts receivable included retention amounts of $5.4 million and $7.5 million, respectively. Retention amounts are in accordance with applicable provisions of engineering and construction contracts and become due upon completion of contractual requirements. Approximately $0.5 million of the retained amount at October 31, 2005, is expected to be collected subsequent to October 31, 2006. No customers accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated accounts receivable balances as of fiscal year ends 2005 and 2004.

POWELL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts arise when revenues are recorded on a percentage-of-completion basis but cannot be invoiced under the terms of the contract. Such amounts are invoiced upon completion of contractual milestones.

      Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts also include certain costs associated with unapproved change orders. These costs are included when change order approval is probable. Amounts are carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value. No profit is recognized on costs incurred until change order approval is obtained. We also include claims for extra work or changes in scope of work to the extent of costs incurred in contract revenues when we believe collection is probable. The amounts recorded involve the use of judgments and estimates; thus, actual recoverable amounts could differ from original assumptions. See Note K — Commitments and Contingencies for a discussion related to certain costs recorded in costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings.

      In accordance with industry practice, assets and liabilities related to costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts, as well as billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts, have been classified as current. The contract cycle for certain long-term contracts may extend beyond one year, thus collection of amounts related to these contracts may extend beyond one year.

      Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market using first-in, first-out (FIFO) or weighted-average methods and include the cost of material, labor and manufacturing overhead. We use estimates in determining the level of reserves required to state inventory at the lower of cost or market. Our estimates are based on market activity levels, production requirements, the physical condition of products and technological innovation. Changes in any of these factors may result in adjustments to the carrying value of inventory.

      Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense when incurred. Expenditures for major renewals and improvements which extend the useful lives of existing equipment are capitalized and depreciated. Upon retirement or disposition of property, plant and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

      We also own one idle facility which is held for sale. As this property is held for sale, the $0.8 million of related net book value is included in other current assets at October 31, 2005.

      We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying amount of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be fully recoverable. The review for impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill takes into account estimates of future cash flows. Our estimates of future cash flows are based upon budgets and longer-range plans. These budgets and plans are used for internal purposes and are also the basis for communication with outside parties about future business trends. While we believe the assumptions we use to estimate future cash flows are reasonable, there can be no assurance that the expected future cash flows will be realized. As a result, impairment charges that possibly should have been recognized in earlier periods may not be recognized until later periods if actual cash flows deviate unfavorably from earlier estimates. For assets held for sale or disposal, the fair value of the asset is measured using quoted market prices or an estimation of net realizable value. Based on general economic

POWELL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

conditions and conditions specific to our industry, the ultimate amounts realized on assets held for sale may differ materially from their currently estimated realizable values.

      We account for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” This statement requires that goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are no longer amortized but instead requires a test for impairment to be performed annually, or immediately if conditions indicate that impairment could exist. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. For additional information regarding our intangible assets, see Note J.

      We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. This approach requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Developing our provision for income taxes requires significant judgment and expertise in federal and state income tax laws, regulations and strategies, including the determination of deferred tax assets and liabilities and, if necessary, any valuation allowances that may be required for deferred tax assets. We have not recorded any other valuation allowances as of October 31, 2005 because we believe that future taxable income will, more likely than not, be sufficient to realize the benefits of those assets as the temporary differences in basis reverse over time. Our judgments and tax strategies are subject to audit by various taxing authorities.

      Our revenues are primarily generated from engineering and manufacturing of custom products under long-term contracts that may last from one month to several years depending on the contract. Revenues from long-term contracts are recognized on the percentage-of-completion method of accounting as provided by the American Institute for Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts,” (“SOP 81-1”).

      Under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, revenues are recognized as work is performed based on the estimated completion to date calculated by multiplying the total contract price by percentage of performance to date, based on total labor dollars or hours incurred to date to the total estimated labor dollars or hours estimated at completion. Application of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting requires the use of estimates of costs to be incurred for the performance of the contract. Contract costs include all direct material, direct labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs and all costs associated with operation of equipment (excluding depreciation). The cost estimation process is based upon the professional knowledge and experience of the Company’s engineers, project managers, and financial professionals. Factors that are considered in estimating the work to be completed and ultimate contract recovery include the availability and productivity of labor, the nature and complexity of the work to be performed, the effect of change orders, the availability of materials, the effect of any delays in performance and the recoverability of any claims. Changes in job performance, job conditions, estimated profitability and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income, and their effects are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Whenever revisions of estimated contract costs and contract values indicate that the contract costs will exceed estimated revenues, thus creating a loss, a provision for the total estimated loss is recorded in that period.

      Revenues associated with maintenance, repair and service contracts are recognized when the services are performed in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition, Revised and Updated.” Expenses related to these types of services are recognized as incurred.

POWELL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      We provide for estimated warranty costs at the time of sale based upon historical rates applicable to individual product lines. In addition, specific provisions are made when the costs of such warranties are expected to exceed accruals. Our standard terms and conditions of sale include a warranty for parts and service for the earlier of 18 months from the date of shipment or 12 months from the date of initial operations.

      Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. These costs are included as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations. Such amounts were $2.8 million, $3.5 million, and $3.6 million in fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      The functional currency for the company’s foreign subsidiaries is the local currency in which the entity is located. The financial statements of all subsidiaries with a functional currency other than the U.S. Dollar have been translated into U.S. Dollars in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation.” All assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into U.S. Dollars using year-end exchange rates and all revenues and expenses are translated at average rates during the respective period. The U.S. Dollar results that arise from such translation, as well as exchange gains and losses on intercompany balances of a long-term investment nature, are included in the cumulative currency translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity.

      In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” we have elected to account for our stock-based employee compensation plans under the intrinsic value method established by Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Under APB No. 25, no compensation expense is recorded when the exercise price of the employee stock option is greater than or equal to the market price of the common stock on the grant date.

      In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123(R) which requires companies to measure all employee stock-based compensation awards using a fair value method and record such expense in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) are effective for the first annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. The Company will adopt this standard at the beginning of fiscal 2006 and will elect the modified-prospective transition method. Under the modified-prospective method, awards that are granted, modified, repurchased or canceled after the date of adoption should be measured and accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R). Awards that are granted prior to the effective date should continue to be accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123 except that stock option expense for unvested options must be recognized in the income statement. The impact of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on, among other things, levels of share-based payments granted in the future, the market value of the Company’s common stock as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the Company’s stock price, volatility, and employee stock option exercise behaviors and the related tax impact. However, had the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) in prior periods, the Company believes the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of SFAS No. 123 as described in the above “Stock-Based Employee Compensation” disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share.

POWELL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      If compensation expense for our stock option plans had been determined based on an estimate of the fair value at the grant date for awards consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, our net income and earnings per share would have been as follows: